Refusing A Roadside Breath Test: Worse Than Failing One?

If you are stopped by the police and asked to provide a breath sample, refusing to do so might seem like a way to avoid a drink driving prosecution. 

However, refusing to provide a specimen when legally required can itself be a criminal offence, with potentially serious consequences.

So, is refusing a breath test worse than failing one? The answer depends on the circumstances, but refusing a specimen should never be viewed as an easy alternative to providing one.

When can police request a breath test?

Police can require a driver to provide a preliminary breath test in certain circumstances. This can include where they suspect the driver has been drinking alcohol, where the driver has committed a traffic offence, or where the driver has been involved in a road traffic collision.

If a roadside test indicates that alcohol may be present, the driver may be arrested and taken to a police station or other appropriate location for an evidential test.

What happens if you refuse a breath test?

Refusing to provide a specimen without a reasonable excuse can lead to a separate offence. 

For example, if you are required to provide an evidential specimen and deliberately refuse without a legally recognised reason, you could face prosecution for failing to provide a specimen for analysis.

The potential consequences can include:

  • A driving disqualification
  • A fine
  • Penalty points in certain circumstances
  • Increased insurance costs
  • A criminal conviction

The precise penalty will depend on the offence and the circumstances of the case.

What if you fail the breath test?

A failed breath test does not necessarily mean that you will automatically be convicted of drink driving. Following a positive roadside test, you may be required to provide an evidential specimen. This may be a breath, blood or urine sample, depending on the circumstances.

If the evidential result shows that your alcohol level was above the prescribed legal limit, the prosecution may rely on that evidence when bringing a drink driving charge.

The potential consequences of a drink driving conviction can include a mandatory driving disqualification, a fine and, depending on the circumstances, a community order or imprisonment.

Is refusing a breath test more serious?

There is no simple answer because the consequences depend on exactly what happened and which specimen you were required to provide.

However, refusing a required specimen does not necessarily result in a lesser penalty than a drink driving offence. A conviction for failing to provide a specimen can itself result in disqualification.

There may also be circumstances where a person has a reasonable excuse for being unable to provide a specimen. For example, certain medical conditions may affect a person’s ability to provide a breath sample.

Whether such an explanation amounts to a legally recognised reasonable excuse depends on the individual circumstances and available evidence.

What should you do if you are accused?

If you have been accused of refusing to provide a breath specimen, it may not automatically mean a conviction. The circumstances surrounding the request, the police procedure, the reason for any refusal and the evidence available may all be relevant.

A specialist drink driving solicitor can review the circumstances of the allegation and advise you on your options. This can be particularly important if losing your licence could affect your employment or livelihood.

Overtaking Mistakes That Can Lead To A Driving Prosecution

Overtaking is a normal part of driving, particularly on busy A roads and motorways. However, an overtaking manoeuvre that is poorly judged, aggressive or carried out without sufficient care can result in more than a warning from another driver. 

Depending on the circumstances, it could lead to prosecution for a motoring offence. Understanding what can turn an otherwise routine manoeuvre into dangerous or careless driving can help motorists make safer decisions on the road.

Overtaking without enough visibility

One of the most serious mistakes is attempting to overtake when you cannot see far enough ahead. For example, overtaking near a bend, the brow of a hill or another obstruction can leave insufficient time to return safely to your lane if another vehicle approaches.

A driver who takes an unnecessary risk and causes other road users to take evasive action could potentially face allegations of dangerous driving.

Overtaking at excessive speed

Speeding while overtaking can create additional risks. A driver may accelerate significantly above the speed limit believing that the manoeuvre will only take a few seconds, but the speed limit still applies while overtaking.

Excessive speed can also make it harder to judge distances and react to unexpected hazards.

If the alleged speed is sufficiently high, the consequences can extend beyond penalty points and a fine, with more serious speeding cases potentially resulting in a court hearing and disqualification.

Cutting in too closely

Returning to the left-hand lane too soon can force the vehicle being overtaken to brake suddenly.

This may amount to careless or inconsiderate driving depending on the circumstances. A particularly aggressive manoeuvre could also contribute to a more serious allegation.

Drivers should allow enough space before moving back into lane, rather than immediately cutting in front of the vehicle they have passed.

Overtaking on the wrong side

Drivers should understand when overtaking on the left (also known as undertaking) is permitted and when it could constitute an offence.

Passing another vehicle on the left simply because you are impatient or trying to gain an advantage can create considerable danger. However, there are situations where traffic conditions mean that vehicles in different lanes are travelling at different speeds.

The precise circumstances matter, so drivers should not assume that every instance of passing another vehicle on the left is automatically illegal.

Overtaking cyclists or vulnerable road users without sufficient care

Particular care is needed when passing cyclists, horse riders and other vulnerable road users. Giving insufficient clearance, passing at excessive speed or moving back into the lane too quickly can create a significant risk.

A driver does not necessarily need to collide with another road user for their driving to attract police attention or result in prosecution.

What if you are accused of dangerous or careless driving?

Being accused of an offence does not mean that you will automatically be convicted. The prosecution must prove the relevant offence using admissible evidence.

Evidence could include police observations, dashcam footage, CCTV, witness statements or other recordings.

If you have been reported for an overtaking manoeuvre or are facing a prosecution for careless or dangerous driving, specialist driving solicitors can help you understand the allegation and the potential consequences.